Prioritizing and adhering to Agile principles while scaling is paramount for the success of any organization. The journey from a small entity to achieving scale often involves the collaboration of geographically and functionally dispersed teams whose work is intricately interdependent.
Recognizing and strategically planning for these interdependencies is crucial to ensure that each team’s efforts are harmoniously directed toward a singular, project-focused goal.
The implementation of Program Increment (PI) planning significantly facilitates the attainment of this goal. But what precisely is PI planning, and why does it hold such significance?
PI Planning, an abbreviation for Program Increment Planning, constitutes a vital practice within the Scaled Agile Framework® (SAFe®). These structured events occur every eight to 12 weeks, with the frequency dependent on the duration of the increments. During these planning sessions or ceremonies, large agile teams often seize the opportunity to coordinate and integrate the efforts of smaller team units.
The responsibilities within PI Planning are distributed across different teams agree various roles. Project managers strategize the planned features for the increment, while development teams take ownership of user story planning. Simultaneously, UX designers and researchers contribute to validating the planning. The overarching objective is to align teams not only with the organization’s mission but also with each other.
For those new to the SAFe framework, initiating the journey with the PI Planning ceremony is a foundational step. The framework is specifically designed to enhance visibility, alignment, and collaboration among teams, ultimately leading to heightened productivity, superior results, and accelerated delivery.
Whether an organization adopts all five levels of SAFe or focuses on essential aspects, the cornerstone of the transformation lies in the PI Planning ceremony. This ceremony serves as the linchpin, steering the entire process towards improved efficiency and successful implementation.
PI Planning holds paramount significance for large-scale organizations employing Agile methodologies. Imagine an organization with several thousand developers organized into more manageable units of 400 to 600 individuals per team.
Prior to the implementation of PI planning, it was not uncommon for these distributed teams to operate in relative isolation, seldom engaging in communication unless prompted by significant issues. This isolation often led to the formation of severe organizational silos.
Historically, the alignment of vision within remote teams of such organizations primarily occurred through a top-down approach. Managers of various teams would convene to discuss overarching concepts such as vision, mission, and values.
However, this process involved multiple levels of management, resembling a game of telephone, with information cascading down through hierarchical layers to reach individual teams. Consequently, direct coordination among all the teams themselves was a rarity.
PI Planning constitutes an indispensable component of the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe), a framework meticulously crafted to introduce agile methodologies to large companies with multiple teams.
Within the SAFe context, PI Planning plays a pivotal role in facilitating synchronization, collaboration, and alignment among teams forming the Agile Release Train (ART). This alignment encompasses various aspects, including workflows, objectives, releases, and more.
Conversely, the absence of PI Planning leaves teams without a structured communication framework. This lack of coordination can lead to significant challenges, such as teams unknowingly working on disparate features, potentially resulting in dependencies that might impede the release or necessitate extensive code rework.
The overarching objective of PI Planning is to strategically align all teams and foster cross-team collaboration, thereby preempting potential issues. Having established the rationale behind PI Planning, let’s delve deeper into its operational aspects by examining a comprehensive sprint planning agenda.
Adhering to these three fundamental steps for effective program increment planning is crucial to harness the full potential of the Agile project methodology.
Companies often find that a program increment lasting 8-12 weeks is effective. This duration corresponds to 4-6 iterations, each lasting 2 weeks.
The timing and frequency of PI Planning sessions vary among organizations based on their specific needs and project timelines.
Some organizations adopt a quarterly schedule for regular PI Planning events to provide a structured framework.For instance, Q1 PI Planning might occur in December, followed by Q2 PI Planning in March, Q3 PI Planning in June, and Q4 PI Planning in September.
When scheduling PI Planning sessions, it’s essential to consider holidays and potential disruptions. This ensures that teams can fully engage in the planning process without significant interruptions.
Fixed and regular scheduling of PI Planning sessions offers several advantages. Teams and business owners can plan well in advance, allowing for better preparation and participation.
The regular occurrence of PI Planning enables a structured and well-coordinated approach to project planning and execution. Teams can align their efforts with organizational goals and synchronize their activities.
The preparation leading up to previous PI Planning event is as crucial as the event itself. Proactive planning ensures organizational readiness and logistical readiness for the planning session.
Organizations benefit from a proactive approach to PI Planning, addressing considerations well in advance. This approach contributes to the smooth execution of planning sessions and subsequent project activities.
Consistent scheduling ensures the active participation of the team presents all relevant stakeholders. Stakeholders, including team members and business owners, can allocate time and resources effectively.
The regularity of PI Planning aligns with Agile principles, fostering collaboration, iterative development, and effective execution. It ensures that Agile teams stay true to the core principles even as the organizational scales.
By adhering to a well-defined schedule and prioritizing thorough preparation, organizations set the foundation for successful PI Planning sessions, promoting collaboration and adherence to Agile principles.
Get started
A foundation for PI planning success lies in a comprehensive understanding of the overall company vision and goals. A clear business context, defined mission, actionable roadmap, and prioritized backlogs contribute to effective PI planning.
Goals become meaningful when aligned with tangible business needs and end-user requirements. Ensure a mapping of company goals to actual business needs, providing a roadmap for teams during PI planning.
Each team, irrespective of its size, defines clear and well-defined objectives and associated tasks during PI planning. The commitment made by teams serves as a basis for a management review by business owners to identify risks and assign appropriate business value.
Successful PI planning results in a crystallized set of features, milestones, and precisely defined delivery dates. Program boards are used to identify potential risks and interdependencies among teams, ensuring explicit timelines for feature delivery.
By establishing these inputs and outputs, organizations can streamline the PI planning process, fostering clarity, commitment, and effective collaboration among teams. This structured approach contributes to achieving organizational outcomes more efficiently.
Facilitating open and transparent communication channels is crucial for effective PI planning. Ensuring that all team members and stakeholders have a platform to express ideas, concerns, and updates fosters a collaborative environment.
Cultivating a social network within all the team members of Agile Release Train (ART) enhances team cohesion and cooperation. Encouraging social interactions and team-building activities contributes to a positive and productive ART environment.
The heart of PI planning lies in aligning the development team and efforts with overarching business goals. Teams need a clear understanding of how their work contributes to the broader business objectives, ensuring a unified direction.
Recognizing dependencies between teams and ARTs is essential for streamlined planning. Cultivating collaboration across teams and ARTs promotes knowledge sharing, review and problem solving re-solving, and a collective commitment to success.
Balancing demand and capacity is a key element in PI planning. Ensuring that teams have a realistic assessment of their capacity and aligning it with the demand for work prevents overcommitment and fosters achievable goals.
Striving for efficiency involves minimizing Work in Process (WIP) to maintain a steady workflow. Reducing WIP helps teams focus on high-priority tasks, leading to better productivity and successful PI outcomes.
PI planning requires swift decision-making to adapt to changing circumstances. Establishing mechanisms for quick decision-making ensures that the planning process remains agile and responsive to evolving needs.
Organizations can create a robust foundation for agile PI planning by addressing these detailed aspects, promoting collaboration, goal alignment, and streamlined workflows across Agile Release Trains and teams.
Every PI planning session adheres to a consistent agenda, allowing for adaptation based on team-specific requirements. The standard agenda itself can be modified, for instance, when conducting digital PI planning with remote teams or hybrid teams, necessitating potential adjustments in duration to accommodate diverse time zones.
A leader or executive provides an overview of the current business state, articulates the business owner’ vision, and evaluates the efficacy of existing solutions in meeting customer needs.
The head of product presents the current vision, highlighting upcoming features, addressing changes from the previous PI planning, and introducing imminent milestones.
The System Architect or Engineer outlines the architecture vision, potentially introducing Agile-supportive changes to development practices in the upcoming PI.
The Release Train Engineer (RTE) delineates the planning process and expected outcomes.
Individual teams estimate their iteration capacity, identify backlog items for feature realization, and create draft plans visible to stakeholders.
Teams present key planning outputs, including capacity, draft PI objectives, risks, and dependencies. Stakeholders review and provide input.
Negotiation, management review and problem of scope changes and resolution of challenges occur as management addresses planning adjustments.
Management presents any changes to scope, people, or resources.
Teams refine planning, make necessary adjustments, and finalize objectives with managerial approval.
Teams present plans to senior development manager, outlining risks and obstacles. Teams seek managerial approval, with opportunities for plan adjustments if concerns arise.
Teams collectively address identified risks, discussing and even program risks and categorizing them.
Teams and teams vote mostly on confidence in meeting their objectives. Concerns are addressed, and other teams also voice their confidence levels.
Teams rework plans until achieving a high level of confidence.
The RTE leads a brief retrospective, capturing insights into what went well and areas for improvement in future PI planning events.
In conclusion, Time Off in Lieu (TOIL) is a valuable strategy that benefits employers and employees. TOIL balances addressing business needs and recognizing employees’ efforts by incentivizing additional work without incurring extra costs.
However, its successful implementation relies on a well-crafted policy that delineates responsibilities, ensures clarity in accrue toil and usage, and fosters equitable application. HR’s pivotal role in communicating, maintaining consistency, and nurturing understanding among employees is integral to the effectiveness of the TOIL policy.
Being a digital marketer, I have been working with different clients and following strict deadlines. For me, learning the skill of time management and tracking was crucial for juggling between tasks and completing them. So, writing about time management and monitoring helps me add my flavor to the knowledge pool. I also learned a few things, which I am excited to share with all of you.
